One of the first things that struck me about the world of Feed is how superficial and insular people have become. They've lost their sense of self, they're slaves to consumerism, functioning as mere digits to large corporations. People are trapped in their cocoons, scanning feeds that make up their Daily Me's while oblivious to global events. It's a scary situation, but if you look around us, we're inching closer to that reality every day!
I think all that's going on in the last few years is a preamble for things to come. As it is, the narrowing of our worldviews is being accelerated by collaborative filtering and mass customization. The long tail of ideas may provide us with abundant choices, but it also limits discovery and the ability for us to form new tastes.
Chris Anderson disagrees with this in The Long Tail, choosing to put his faith in the recommendation systems to expose us to ideas outside our interests. I remain skeptical. My Amazon recommendations are full of library-related books and stuff related to Internet culture.
It's also uncanny to think that the characters in the world of Feed were able to pick up the feeds of others and know what they're thinking. In some ways, feeds may be the answer to our problems with human memory, but at what cost? The loss to individual privacy far outweighs anything. In retrospect, I'm glad we kicked up a big fuss over Facebook broadcasting user activity on third-party sites to your friends. It's things like this that remind us of the values that we hold dearly.
Aaron, I read this book last time in a YA lit class, so that definitely affects my perception of it, but I think the insularity is something specific to most teenagers. Those years are years of self absorption and inward focus, which is of course also what helps develop each person's individuality (something which I gather is not as prioritized in more collectivist societies where teens probably know about/care about world events).
We didn't really get to know many adults in this book, but perhaps one could argue that they were rather teenagery themselves, and you would probably conclude that they were representative of their whole society.
Bluegrass Bunch said...
June 4, 2008 at 11:25 AM
It's interesting that you mentioned the ability to read each other people's feeds as a way to preserve memory, because it seemed that though this could have been possible, the feeds seemed to make people less likely to remember anything. That was of course just one of the many ironic things about the oneiric society in Feed, where the potential for dreams to be fulfilled exists, but the dreams themselves are limited.
sm said...
June 7, 2008 at 9:55 PM
Abigail, even in so-called collectivist societies, things are changing. The youth in Japan, for instance, have been apathetic for a while. The deluge of peer production tools in the last 5 years have provided channels for them to express their individuality and anti-establishment sentiments.
Anonymous said...
June 7, 2008 at 11:28 PM