wtscils598x08

Overall, this class has been a positive experience for me. Apart from learning how to apply Web 2.0 tools in a library setting, the diversity of the class also brings fresh new perspectives on what libraries should focus on as they move into the age of participation. If I was Steve, I'd continue to incorporate tools like IM, Twitter and wikis which really gives students a chance to experience what online collaboration across time and space is like if they haven't done it before.

Perhaps enrollment numbers for the summer session should be capped so that it's easier to keep up with everyone's thoughts and ideas. The short duration of the summer session leaves very little time for contemplation and discussion over one another's blog posts. Also, while gaming can be a social process, I don't see it as part of social software which is more an area within Library 2.0. For a summer class, I'll probably include screencasting and subtract gaming from the syllabus.

For the section on IM, I will also include issues that libraries are facing in virtual reference such as serving unaffiliated users, question routing, and bibliographic instruction. These may probably be more suited for a reference class, but a look these issues will offer a good perspective on the challenges of IM at work.

I also love the examples of libraries that have implemented the social software covered in this class. But it'll also be great if we can also hear from guest lecturers from some of these libraries, perhaps in a podcast interview! This will give us a better idea of what goes on behind the scenes and provide useful lessons as we take what we've learned into our respective organizations.